Hi Guys! (If there's anyone looking into :D )
I thought of writing something everyday in this blog, just my musings... my stupid thoughts...
So here you go with today's :
Is the bell curve concept truly identifying the nowaday's employee rankings?
As we have different kind of brains, which are supernatural in their own way, every human being is kind of a super guy.
Therefore applying the bell curve concept to a group of people who are supernatural is not doing any aid to them, rite mates? ;)
As you see bell curve, only a 5% of employees fall under "A" players, and only a 5% belongs to poor performers, and the rest of the employees, the majority (~90%) belongs to average performers...
hmm.... That ain't right, nah?
How can the super performers be calculated under average performers?
Therfore the curve should be revised and the super performers should get promoted and benefited.
With regards,
Idiotic Anojan :)
I thought of writing something everyday in this blog, just my musings... my stupid thoughts...
So here you go with today's :
Is the bell curve concept truly identifying the nowaday's employee rankings?
As we have different kind of brains, which are supernatural in their own way, every human being is kind of a super guy.
Therefore applying the bell curve concept to a group of people who are supernatural is not doing any aid to them, rite mates? ;)
As you see bell curve, only a 5% of employees fall under "A" players, and only a 5% belongs to poor performers, and the rest of the employees, the majority (~90%) belongs to average performers...
hmm.... That ain't right, nah?
How can the super performers be calculated under average performers?
Therfore the curve should be revised and the super performers should get promoted and benefited.
With regards,
Idiotic Anojan :)
No comments:
Post a Comment